Showing posts with label Renuka Fernando. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Renuka Fernando. Show all posts

Saturday, March 19, 2016

Expanded drawing discussion

Gillian Lavery, Camperdown Spiral, 2016, durational wall drawing, graphite on silk

The term 'expanded' is used across art forms to express how traditional art practice has developed with fusions of media, hybridism and changing understandings of materiality, space and temporality. In Tracing Materiality the artists' diverse practices are linked by mark-making hand gestures, that is to say 'drawing'. However, these drawing processes are expanded by duration, performance and documentation into ways of recording active embodied experiences of time, space and materiality, they communicate and discover various ways of analyzing the world and visual artistic languages using both non-traditional and traditional materials.

Please join our Expanded Drawing discussion to tease out some of these ideas around expanded drawing practices and how they are present and evolving in the processes and works in the exhibition. The discussion panel will include artists Gillian Lavery, Renuka Fernando and Kath Fries, and be chaired by Megan Robson, (Assistant Curator at the Museum of Contemporary Art Australia), 2pm Sunday 20th March, at Chrissie Cotter Gallery. Followed by finissage drinks with the artists, a final viewing of the exhibition and Gillian Lavery's erasure performance. 



This event is proudly presented as part of Art Month Sydney 2016
http://www.artmonthsydney.com.au/talks/tracing-materiality--artists-talks/

We're looking forward to Megan Robson chairing our Expanded Drawing finissage discussion. Megan is Assistant Curator at the Museum of Contemporary Art Australia, where she recently curated the exhibitions Martu Art from the Far Western Desert, 2014 (co-curated with Anna Davis) and MCA Collection: New Acquisitions in Context, 2013. She has worked across a range of exhibitions including solo projects with Aleks Danko, Sylvie Blocher, Runa Islam, Anish Kapoor, Christian Marclay, and Annette Messager, and group exhibitions such as String Theory: Focus on contemporary Australian art, and Marking Time. She is currently working on an exhibition that explores the history of the MCA's Primavera series of exhibitions.
Previously she has worked for a number of art organisations in Australia and the UK, including the Barbican Centre, London and the Biennale of Sydney. In 2011, Megan received an Asialink grant to undertake curatorial research in Hong Kong with co-curator Joel Mu. She writes regularly on contemporary art for a range of publications and journals.

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Gillian Lavery - Making work live in the gallery.

Why would you choose to make work in the gallery?

The question about performance and performative drawing is something that Kath, Ren and myself have been discussing a lot in thinking about this exhibition. The notion of making work live in the gallery puts you in a fairly vulnerable position - but the possibilities that come from it are also rich.

I am often surprised by the reaction of viewers when they see the artist at work in the gallery.
Some people really like it and engage in conversation, the opportunity to talk about what you are doing – is this different when you are just minding the gallery?




There are some people who think that they are interrupting you – but this is never the case. It is not a performance in that way as there is no invisible line between myself and the viewer. It is about a space of conversation. There is no direction or plan, nor beginning or end, common elements of a performance.




I am trying to break down the barrier of visibility between process and end result. Part of the work is actually engaging in that conversation and opening up the opportunity to discuss process and what it means and feels like to make your work. I am not sure whether this would have the same effect if the work was complete and you were minding the gallery.






The conversation becomes part of the work because, like the making, the repetition of it allows the ideas to be thought through and played with, experimented with. You test out how you are thinking about the work when you engage in a conversation with someone. Sometimes they lead somewhere sometimes they don’t, and sometimes the result is surprising. 





Gillian Lavery

Saturday, March 12, 2016

Gillian Lavery - What has evolved.

Walking to the gallery this morning and I realised something.
I haven’t been here for a few days...
I don’t know what has evolved, what has been created and what has changed during the week.

It is not often that you go to mind the gallery of an exhibition you are in with the sense of not knowing what you will be greeted by.
More often than not you install a show and then it stays that way until you take it down. But that is not the case for this exhibition – and it is really exciting.

As I settled into my minding/drawing shift I noticed the subtle changes in the colour of the bees wax on Kath’s works and the shifts the powdered charcoal had made. I reacquainted myself with Ren’s drawings, making note of the additional marks on the paper and the quite dramatic transformation of the canvas (see below). The feeling of activity and energy lingered in the space. It was an energy I then used to continue my own drawing. I wonder if this sense of activity is as evident to the viewer and whether this changes their experience of the exhibition.


Renuka Fernando, Continuous Drawing, 2016, mixed media on canvas and preparatory sketches    

When Ren popped in later on we discussed how the works had changed, what she tried, what worked, what didn’t, and where to go from here... 

I am looking forward to seeing what happens next week.



Gillian Lavery
www.gillianlavery.com



Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Install week - work in progress

We've been in the gallery for three days now and our Tracing Materiality projects are underway! Here's a preview of the works in progress, you can view more on Instagram - @renfernando @kath_fries @gillian_lavery #tracingmateriality - and the gallery will be open from Saturday for Marrickville Open Studios Trail, so you can see in person how our works are evolving with our Continuous Drawing processes.

Renuka Fernando

Renuka Fernando

Renuka Fernando

Gillian Lavery

Gillian Lavery

Gillian Lavery

Kath Fries

Kath Fries

Kath Fries

Kath Fries

See videos and more photos on Instagram
www.instagram.com/explore/tags/tracingmateriality/

Interview - Marrickville Art Post MOST feature

Art Post: What's On - MOST Feature interview
artpost.marrickville.nsw.gov.au/node/20226

Tell us a little about yourselves and how this project came about?
The three of us were discussing how we all work with open-ended processes, so our idea for this exhibition started with a conversation, which became a series of conversations, exchanges of ideas, questions and references. Many of these circled the idea of “not knowing” and how this notion plays a role in art practice, so this project and exhibition explores the notion of practice as a place where things can happen, as opposed to producing finished objects.
What is the current creative project you’re working on and what is the inspiration behind it? 
Gillian Lavery – I am currently exploring ways to open up the process of making artwork to the viewer, to give it more visibility and importance rather than focusing on the end result. After travelling around Japan, Europe, the UK and Iceland, and undertaking two artist residencies last year I am still processing everything that I have seen and experienced. I know that these will continue to inform my work for the next few years, though I am not exactly sure how yet.
Kath Fries – My work for Tracing Materiality explores tactile and sensory engagements with beeswax and paper, using scratching translucencies, drips, changing natural light and the beeswax’s aromatic presence. I plan to create installations in Chrissie Cotter Gallery that respond to pre-existing aspects of the space including the natural light of the windows, old bolts in the ceiling and the lightboxes by the staircase. These installations will combine site sensitivity with the tactility and mutability of beeswax as a drawing material.
Renuka Fernando – I’m currently working on series of small rapid sketches which I began on a recent trip to Canada. Although I don't consider the drawings referential as such, they are influenced by my road trip across British Columbia during the winter. From these sketches I will be working on a larger drawing, which will take place within the gallery during the course of the exhibition. I like to be led by the drawing process itself and respond to the materiality of the drawing and the surface up which it is made. In turn I consider the drawing to be essentially linked to the place in which it is made and I hope to respond both to the gallery space itself and the other works which will be occur within the gallery.
What drives your creativity?  
We all share a similar desire to think about things through materials and processes. It's a way to understand other people and the world and connect to others, be it family or other artists, writers or thinkers.
What creative artists have most inspired or influenced you - and why?
Gillian Lavery - William Kentrige is of particular interest to me at the moment. Part of this is the way that he articulates his process and emphasises the importance of play and open ended experimentation in his practice. Louise Bourgeois has influenced me for a very long time and it was seeing her work in Paris many years ago that prompted me to go to art school. I am inspired by the way that she had stayed true to her subject and herself against all odds, she made what she wanted to, what she had to. She also works across so many different mediums - though I am particularly interested in her drawings and textile pieces. 
Kath Fries - I’m most interested in the practices of artists who work with the instability and changing nature of materiality. Like Hannah Bertram, a Melbourne artist, works with dust to create meticulous, decorative, temporal installations that are deliberately destroyed at the conclusion of the process. I was lucky to visit Teshima Museum in Japan an few years ago and was really inspired by the serene water droplet Matrixinstallation by Rei Natio, where visitors sit inside a tranquil architectural/landscape space, designed by Ryue Nishizawa, to watch and feel tiny trickles of water seep out of the undulating floor and gradually be absorbed back into it again.
Renuka Fernando - I have always been drawn to artists that have an interest in the mark making process. I saw a retrospective of Cy Twombly’s work in London and I was overwhelmed by the sheer scale and energy embedded in his marks, particularly the Bacchus series (2005). Locally I have always loved the work of Sally Gabori and Tony Tuckson. To be honest it’s very difficult to narrow it down to only a few.
What are you aiming to communicate through your work?
We all tend to think of our practices as a way of opening up a space of exploration. We don’t have a message beyond inviting people into a space that is different to what they experience in their every day life. 
What do you hope will be the outcome of it?  How will you judge its success?
There are many levels of success in a work of art. We are mostly interested in how one work or exhibition provides a path for the next work. Installing and exhibiting these works together might generate a whole new line of enquiry. As long as we are learning, pushing ourselves and taking risks then we are satisfied. If the viewer enjoys it and gets something out of it too - then that is an added bonus. 
What is your next project? 
Gillian Lavery - I am working on something for a group show at 107 Projects in Redfern in May. I am hoping to use some of the experiments that I was working on in Iceland for that show and see where I can take them. 
Kath Fries - I’m working on a paper-bark doorway installation with oyster mushrooms growing in it for a group exhibition ‘Out of Time’ at Airspace Projects, Marrickville in May. 
Renuka Fernando - In June I will be doing an artist residency with the Chris O’Brien Lifehouse Foundation in Camperdown. The residency takes place within the hospital and I will get the opportunity to work with patients and visitors introducing the ideas of mark making as a means of self-expression and play.
What are your future goals?
Keep making, playing, thinking… 
What are your favourite places in Marrickville (park, music venue, bar, coffee shop, other) to work or wind down?
Gillian Lavery - When I had a studio in Marrickville I loved spending my lunch at Henson Park. I enjoyed lying in the grass and watching the sky and listening to people walking their dogs, children on the play equipment and the occasional tennis match. 
Kath Fries - I live around the corner from Willie the Boatman microbrewery - we’ll have some of their beers at our Tracing Materiality exhibition opening! Also on Mary Street is Sample Coffee Roasting, they have a lovely cafĂ© and I buy their coffee beans. Over the road is St Peter's Fruit World, which stocks a great range of fresh fruit and veggies as well as local yogurts, cheeses, tofu and dumplings made in the Marrickville area.
Renuka Fernando - I love that little hole in the wall Vietnamese place on Illawarra Road, they do the best Banh Mi in Sydney.

-----


Sunday, February 7, 2016

Gillian Lavery - Some preliminary thoughts on time, chance and not knowing.

Like most, the idea for this exhibition started with a conversation. This became a series of conversations, exchanges of ideas, questions, references... Many of these circled the idea of not knowing and how this notion plays a role in art practice. I came across this idea in On Not Knowing: How Artists Think (by Elizabeth Fisher & Rebecca Fortnum (eds). I found the notion of practice as a place where things can happen, as opposed to an object, enlightening. It is a mode of working that I am continuing to explore.

Each of the artists in this exhibition has a very different way of utilising not knowing. Kath uses materials; in this case bees wax, as tools with which to draw, exploiting their unique qualities and properties. The artwork is installed in relation to the particular space. It is in one state of completion when the exhibition opens, however, due to the vulnerable nature of the materials, it is perpetually unfixed and proceeds to transform over the duration of the exhibition. The artwork is never fully stable, nor does Kath control or pre-determine the exact outcome. She sets it up and allows the materials to interact with the environmental and architectural conditions of the location. She therefore allows chance, change and not knowing to play a large role in the artwork.

Kath Fries, Solace, Hill End, 2013



Similarly Renuka’s work is not static, she is constantly changing and adjusting it in the space. Renuka enters the gallery with a set of materials and reference points in hand, and works in response to these within the space and time frame of the exhibition. While the result or outcome is not predetermined she has control over how the work changes; each decision is made in the moment.

Renuka Fernando, Studio Articulate, 2015

It is a generous gesture to share the figuring-it-out, studio-like space with the viewer. It is a reminder that what you see in the gallery is simply a point in time in the history of an artwork even though we tend to think of it as ‘the end’, whole, complete, finished. It is rare the artist themselves will think an artwork as an end point, nonetheless it is often viewed as such.   




In this exhibition I have two different but complementary artworks. The first is two stop-motion making/unmaking documentary animations. I never completely know how these documentary animations are going to look; I only know what it feels like to make them. Each time I have incorporated a situational component that places me in a less controlled position. I enjoy discovering the work when it becomes an animation, seeing what occurred from a different perspective of making.  

Gillian Lavery, Blondous Spiral (screen shot), 2015, animation


The addition of a wall drawing provides an alternative reference to time and a different aspect of not knowing. I know the shape and types of mark that I am going to make; the pencils that I am going to use and I have a set time frame. But I am not exactly sure what will occur during the making of this work. It is always a unique experience to engage with the audience when one is working in the gallery space.


This wall drawing will be created and destroyed over the course of the exhibition. At the finissage event there will be a formal erasure of the drawing. In concert with the animations created through unpicking, the erasure of the drawing will form a starting point for new work. It is a deliberate choice to work in a way where rather than the material artwork it is the act of making (or unmaking) that is the primary focus.